CO129-027 - Public Offices - 1848 — Page 22

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

3561 H.K.

with the expansion of an inquiry that the miscarriage of justice in the case of the letter to his Excellency with reference to Palmerston. This letter is best to be sent to Journal. Probably it might answer very fully Leyard's assertion without the imputation of bad design.

Care has been taken in this description. I chose not to send it to Palmerston, which incurred apparently some delay in being submitted to Hong Kong for trial. Lachen was there that they wanted to get rid of any afristame. Though quite legal, the handwriting jury; but the assumare that copy will readily find his afristame &c., measure what may.

79

Bright adinsatte by the F.O. (with whom the first steps seem to rest Ainically.

Bom Jand.

97

I don't see what the F.O. can do in this case. The geassert suured from the Judge has not been alverned to the Left. It was conceally reported, the Judge & in fact prevented the Bill from being passed, that it seemed to my if the proceedings were Law said on 2361 Hong Kong.

Forand

Did the psy of synnes not butt to the manner in which the law is administered in Ary.

20

Lord Fey

145 Hong Kong

that the question relating to office har with the matter is. The only concern the Wrigen was not in sealt, the failure to obtain a convict God exlasing my hoke.

Mansmit a copy of this to the Canu. In this case died it unn suffered by the Act & mypeth tent it hereafter witness who absconded to be forthcoming another bill of indictment be referred to thesis this to be lyve "I najver.

Write a letter to Govt respecting to this to the effect of the letter to the F.O. I shall also be glad to be informed by Hd Merivale whether a draft has been prepared respecting Admiralty juris. with will comove the necessity for grand jury in future cases tried at Hong Kong & whether if this is not the effect "the bill as it stands such a clause wo without.

$

Marney

5.91

mconvemend

Edit History

2026-05-17 06:11:16 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
3561 H.K. with the expansion of an inquiry that the miscarriage of justice in the case of the letter to his Excellency with reference to Palmerston. This letter is best to be sent to Journal. Probably it might answer very fully Leyard's assertion without the imputation of bad design. Care has been taken in this description. I chose not to send it to Palmerston, which incurred apparently some delay in being submitted to Hong Kong for trial. Lachen was there that they wanted to get rid of any afristame. Though quite legal, the handwriting jury; but the assumare that copy will readily find his afristame &c., measure what may. 79 Bright adinsatte by the F.O. (with whom the first steps seem to rest Ainically. Bom Jand. 97 I don't see what the F.O. can do in this case. The geassert suured from the Judge has not been alverned to the Left. It was conceally reported, the Judge & in fact prevented the Bill from being passed, that it seemed to my if the proceedings were Law said on 2361 Hong Kong. Forand Did the psy of synnes not butt to the manner in which the law is administered in Ary. 20 Lord Fey 145 Hong Kong that the question relating to office har with the matter is. The only concern the Wrigen was not in sealt, the failure to obtain a convict God exlasing my hoke. Mansmit a copy of this to the Canu. In this case died it unn suffered by the Act & mypeth tent it hereafter witness who absconded to be forthcoming another bill of indictment be referred to thesis this to be lyve "I najver. Write a letter to Govt respecting to this to the effect of the letter to the F.O. I shall also be glad to be informed by Hd Merivale whether a draft has been prepared respecting Admiralty juris. with will comove the necessity for grand jury in future cases tried at Hong Kong & whether if this is not the effect "the bill as it stands such a clause wo without. $ Marney 5.91 mconvemend
Baseline (Original)
: 3561 H.K. with the spachsion of an the that the miscarriage of the Etter to his with refie to Palmerston This letters to boy best to Journa Portably it might asw cory vryf gry Leyorey ascention mansh quconates In without the inputation of bad destino. care of this description L Lowship, I chs not Adonically paper le tis me to recommend sendly Palmerton: which incured apparently submitted tod 4 mong Hong Kong for trial Lachen there that they wmed to of any afristame Itough quits legal, & the hand jury: but the asumare Bat copy willi nady to fin his agristame &-any, masure what may 79 Bright adinsatte by the 7.0. (with whom the frist steps seam to rest Ainically. ? Bom Jand. 97 I dont see what the F.D. can do in A Annered. The geassert suured from the this case have not been alverned to the Left. concelly reported, the Judge & in fast prevented the Bill from being that it seemed to my if the pesceedings were Lan said on 2361 Hong Kong. Forand Did the psy of synnes) to not my butt to the manner in why the law is administered in Ary 20 Lord Fey 145 Hory Mong that the question relating to office har with the matter is The only concern the Wrigen was not in sealt, the failure to obtain a convite God exlasing my hoke Mansmit a cofly of this to the the Canu this case died it It unn suffered by the Act & mypeth tent it hereafter witness who absconded to be fortheolding another bill of inchitmuty be referred to thesis this to be lyve "I najver Write a to Gort respecting to this to the effect of the letter to the 7.0. Myerted by the Meriah - I've also be glad to be informed by Hd Merivale whether the all of which a draft dus been prepared respectf Retmiralty paris. with will comove the necessity for hoof grand janis in future cases trieel at & whether if this is not the effect "the bill us it stands such a clause wo without $ as Marney introduced Hone Kory. 5.91 mconvemend
2026-05-17 06:11:16 · Baseline
View content

:

3561 H.K.

with the

spachsion of an

the that the

miscarriage of

the

Etter

to his

with refie

to Palmerston

This letters to

boy best to Journa

Portably it might asw

cory vryf gry Leyorey ascention mansh

quconates In without the inputation of bad destino.

care of

this description L

Lowship, I chs not

Adonically paper le tis

me to recommend sendly Palmerton: which incured apparently submitted tod

4 mong Hong Kong for trial Lachen

there

that they wmed to of any

afristame

Itough quits legal,

& the hand jury: but the asumare Bat copy willi

nady to fin his agristame &-any,

masure what

may

79

Bright adinsatte

by the 7.0. (with whom the frist steps seam

to rest

Ainically.

?

Bom Jand.

97

I dont see what the F.D. can do in

A

Annered.

The geassert

suured from the

this case have not been alverned to the Left.

concelly reported, the Judge

& in fast prevented the Bill from being

that it seemed to my if the pesceedings were Lan said on 2361 Hong Kong.

Forand

Did the

psy of synnes) to not my butt to the manner in why the law is administered in Ary

20

Lord Fey

145 Hory Mong

that the question relating to

office har with the matter is

The only concern the Wrigen

was not in sealt,

the failure to obtain a convite God exlasing my hoke

Mansmit a cofly of this to the

the

Canu

this case died it

It unn

suffered by the Act & mypeth tent it hereafter

witness who absconded to be fortheolding another bill of inchitmuty

be referred to thesis this to be lyve "I

najver

Write a

to Gort respecting

to this to the effect of the letter to the 7.0. Myerted by the Meriah - I've also be glad to be informed by Hd Merivale whether the all of which a draft dus been prepared respectf Retmiralty paris. with will comove the necessity for hoof grand janis in future cases

trieel at & whether if this is not the effect

"the bill us it stands such a clause wo without

$

as

Marney

introduced

Hone

Kory.

5.91

mconvemend

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.